While obviously the cast of character in Game of Thrones can’t be handily divided between Good and Evil, it is still a moral series, with a clear sense of and ideas about what is right and what is wrong. It may have its fair share of amoral characters, but the show is not amoral itself. Each character in the complicated ethical landscape of the series has something to say. But my favorite statement has always come from Tywin Lannister.
Saying that might concern you. Sure,
Tywin may not be as deplorable as Joffrey or Theon, but he isn’t exactly nice
either. Perhaps you’re worried I’m about to say something really tedious and
juvenile about “doing what’s necessary for survival,” like I’m 14 and Marilyn
Manson is the hottest shit ever, and you thought I was better than that. If so,
thank you, and don’t worry.
As it has been throughout human
history, torture is a popular practice, and even pastime in the world of the
series, particularly in…well, actually, in all seasons of the adaptation, but I’m
thinking specifically in season 2, when everyone is at war and has an excess of
prisoners. In Robb Stark’s camp, Roose Bolton suggests all their prisoners be
tortured and killed, and I’m sure if you asked him, he’d argue it was necessary
for survival. And, viewed through the cold, brutal eyes of logistics, he does
have a point—they have nowhere to house these prisoners, it’s costly to feed
them (even costlier to feed them well), and setting them free is likely to just
bolster their enemy ranks. But Robb won’t allow that, because it isn’t right.
Robb is 100% correct, however just asserting rightness doesn’t exactly sway
someone like Roose, who comes from a family so well-known for torture, they
made their heraldry a big advertisement for their love of torture.
Meanwhile, when Arya arrives at
Harrenhal, we see how things are done in the camp of The Mountain, Tywin’s most
fearsome man. There, the soldiers seem intent on rooting out and destroying “the
Brotherhood.” Who is this Brotherhood? We don’t know, this is the first time
we’ve heard about them, and in that, we are not alone, because the devastated
peasants being viciously tortured to death seem to have no idea either. Several
dead peasants later, Tywin rides in, and surveys the situation. Now, we’ve seen
that Tywin is a lot of things—cold, distant, harsh, calculating, ruthless,
war-hardened, scheming, nothing particularly nice. But one thing he is not is
patient with lesser minds, a cohort which appears to include every character in
the series. His irritated perspective: Why are we wasting all this skilled
labor? He even asks Gendry, who’s about to have a very bad day, if he has a
trade, to which Gendry answers that he’s a blacksmith. “Blacksmith,” Tywin
repeats like he’s illustrating the point to a bunch of dim children…which he
more or less is. Tywin isn’t a good man with no stomach for brutality, but he
is a pragmatic man with no tolerance for frivolity and waste. Seemingly alone
in the series, he’s smart enough to see the nihilistic pointlessness of wanton
cruelty. In a culture where we’re often battered with simplistic divides
between irrational rightness and rational survival, it’s nice to see a
character who’s too smart and pragmatic for shallow pragmatism.
Unfortunately, Tywin doesn’t quite
go far enough. He may stop the torture, but he still insists his idiot men find
the Brotherhood. He may sneer with contempt when he says he hoped an underling
“had talents beyond brutalizing peasants,” but he still let that underling
brutalize those peasants. He may derisively tell Arya that she shouldn’t let
the Mountain drink lest his work suffer, he’ll still use the Mountain. This, to
me, makes Tywin one of the series’ most tragic figures. He has all the genius,
and for the sake of empty tradition, he sublimates it to a broken system he
recognizes as broken. Tywin is, ultimately, a very sad character, one who had
the means to be anything, but let his corrupt society shape him rather than
reshaping it into a form more to his liking.
For a case study in what Tywin let
himself get shaped into, you need look no further than his children. He burdens
them with external expectations, derived from how he needs and expects them to
navigate the dysfunctional system of nobility, and they drive themselves nuts
out of both fear of him and a desire to please him, until they’re all but
destroyed. But, at least in the adaptation, as we see flashes of the moral man
he might have been in his contempt for the cruel, we also see flashes of the
father he might have been in his interactions with Arya. To be sure, he would
not have been a cuddly funtime dad wearing the crazy hat down the log flume,
but he shows Arya respect for just being herself, imparts wisdom, and takes
what for him has to count as delight in her intelligence rebelliousness, with
no expectation. It’s a damn sight more than his fealty to the notions of noble
houses and feudal traditions allowed him to give his children.
Because at the end of the day, how
smart you are matters much less than what you do with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment